Yield profile of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) in comparison with meadow fescue (F-pratensis) in Finland

Citation
O. Niemelainen et al., Yield profile of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) in comparison with meadow fescue (F-pratensis) in Finland, GRASS FOR S, 56(3), 2001, pp. 249-258
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE
ISSN journal
01425242 → ACNP
Volume
56
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
249 - 258
Database
ISI
SICI code
0142-5242(200109)56:3<249:YPOTF(>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Yield profile characteristics of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), cv. Retu, were compared with those of meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis Hud s.). The study was conducted in Finland and was based on official variety t rial data recorded between 1980 and 1998 at 17 trial sites between latitude s 60 degrees and 66 degreesN. The crops were managed according to silage-cu tting regimes. The pattern of yield formation of the tall fescue cv. Retu d iffered significantly from that of meadow fescue cultivars, both within a g rowing season as well as in sward age. Tall fescue cv. Retu established slo wly, and the dry-matter (DM) yield front the first cut, made in the first y ear of harvest, was significantly lower than that for meadow fescue. In the second and third years, the DM yield from the first cut did not differ bet ween tall fescue and meadow fescue. Tall fescue produced significantly high er DM yield as regrowth (second and third cuts) than meadow fescue. The swa rd age significantly affected total DM production. In first-year swards, th ere were no significant differences in total DM yield between tall fescue a nd meadow fescue but, in the second- and third-year swards, tall fescue pro duced significantly higher DM yields than meadow fescue. The difference in yield profile between tall fescue and meadow fescue was similar in all the environments included in the study. DM yield for the first cut (ka DM lia(- 1)) for tall fescue cv. Retu, in comparison with meadow fescue cultivars, w as 2495 vs. 3099 (P<0.001), 3735 vs. 3741 (NS, P=0.94) and 3553 vs, 3468 (N S, P=0.30) in the first-, second- and third-year swards respectively. The r espective DM regrowth yields (second plus third cut) were: 6059 vs. 5416 (P <0.001); 5445 vs. 4221 (P<0.001); and 5580 vs. 4113 (P<0.001) in first-, se cond- and third-year swards. Total DM yields per season for tall fescue vs. meadow fescue were (kg DM ha(-1)) 8554 vs. 8515 (NS, P=0.69), 9180 vs. 796 2 (P<0.001) and 9133 vs. 7581 (P<0.001) in first-, second- and third-year s wards respectively. Over the three-year sward rotation period, which is com mon in Finland, tall fescue produced on average 12% higher DM yield than me adow fescue. Both tall fescue and meadow fescue suffered little winter dama ge in Finnish conditions; the differences between cultivars of the two spec ies were small. The results indicated that tall fescue cv. Retu is a produc tive and persistent forage species suited to Finnish growing conditions.