Response to fludarabine in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients previously treated with chlorambucil as up-front therapy and a CHOP-like regimen as second line therapy
V. Liso et al., Response to fludarabine in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients previously treated with chlorambucil as up-front therapy and a CHOP-like regimen as second line therapy, HAEMATOLOG, 86(11), 2001, pp. 1165-1171
Background and Objectives. Fludarabine (FAMP) is the most active single age
nt in relapsed and refractory patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leuk
emia (B-CLL). However, it is not clear whether it should be used immediatly
after failure of chlorambucil (CLB). We addressed such an issue retrospect
ively analyzing a series of patients in whom FAMP was used as third-line th
erapy after a sequential use of CLB and CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin
, vincristine, prednisone) or CHOP-like regimen, respectively.
Design and Methods. On a retrospective basis, 57 B-CLL patients fulfilling
the above mentioned criteria and followed-up in seven different hematologic
institutions, were evaluated.
Results. Of 57 patients who were evaluated for response, 3 (5.2%) achieved
a complete response (CR), 30 (52.6%) had a partial response (PR) and the re
maining 24 (42.1%) failed to respond to FAMP Overall median survival from t
he start of FAMP therapy was 30 months. Survival by tumor response did not
show any difference between responders and non-responders (p = 0.536). The
survival was significantly shorter in the group of patients with progressiv
e disease than in all other patients included in our study (p = 0.05). Usin
g each patient as his own control (McNemar test) we attempted to evaluate t
he value of FAMP in inducing a therapeutic response after failure of previo
us therapies. Among the 37 patients resistant to CLB the response rate was
40.3% with FAMP (p 0.037) and only 17.5% with CHOP (p = 1.0). Among 35 pati
ents resistant to a CHOP-like regimen, the response rate was 29.8% (p = 0.0
66) after FAMP therapy.
Interpretation and Conclusions. From our results, it seems that FAMP works
better than a CHOP-like regimen in patients resistant to CLB although resul
ts do not translate into a survival advantage for responders. (C) 2001, Fer
rata Storti Foundation.