This article discusses the new microhistory of the 1970s and 1980s in terms
of the concept of exceptional typical, and contrasts the new microhistory
to old microhistory, in which the relationship between micro and macro leve
ls of phenomena was defined by means of the concepts of exceptionality and
typicality. The focus of the essay is on Carlo Ginzburg's method of clues,
Walter Benjamin's idea of monads, and Michel de Certeau's concept of margin
s. The new microhistory is also compared with methodological discussions in
t he social sciences. In the mid-1970s concepts like the micro-macro link o
r the microfoundations of macrotheory were introduced in sociology and econ
omics. But these largely worked in terms of the concepts of typicality or e
xceptionality, and this has proved to be problematic. Only historians have
developed concepts that escape these and the older definitions of the micro
-macro relationship; indeed, the 'new microhistory' can best be described i
n terms of the notion of 'exceptional typical'. The essay explores the mean
ing of this notion.