Options for determining the response to growth hormone (GH) replacement in
adults include symptomatic response, changes in body composition and measur
ement of biochemical markers of GH action. It has become apparent from vari
ous studies and during routine clinical practice that abnormal elevation of
serum markers of GH action during GH therapy may not be associated with ei
ther adverse symptoms or abnormalities in body composition, thereby limitin
g the value of subjective assessment and physical characteristics as safety
markers of overtreatment. Candidate biochemical markers include insulinlik
e growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) and the acid-lab
ile subunit (ALS), and markers of bone remodelling. No single measurement p
rovides an ideal index of adequacy of GH replacement. Serum IGF-I has the g
reatest utility during GH dose titration as it is more sensitive to changes
in GH status than IGFBP-3 and ALS, and is also more sensitive to excessive
GH replacement. IGF-I, therefore, provides an important safety marker. Fur
thermore, changes in IGF-I correlate with improvements in body composition.
Changes in circulating insulin and leptin occur during GH therapy, but are
significantly influenced by changes in body fat and its distribution and d
o not provide useful information upon which to gauge responsiveness to GH.
Markers of bone remodelling are an important indicator of GH action within
individuals, but exhibit wide inter-individual variation which limits their
usefulness in defining relative GH responsiveness. Copyright (C) 2001 S. K
arger AG, Basel.