Y. Ozawa et al., Effect of T-type selective calcium antagonist on renal microcirculation - Studies in the isolated perfused hydronephrotic kidney, HYPERTENSIO, 38(3), 2001, pp. 343-347
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Although calcium antagonists exert preferential vasodilation of renal affer
ent arterioles, we have recently demonstrated that nilvadipine and efonidip
ine, possessing both L-type and T-type calcium channel blocking action, rev
erse the angiotensin (Ang) II-induced afferent and efferent arteriolar cons
triction. In the present study, we investigated the role of T-type calcium
channels in mediating the Ang II-induced efferent arteriolar tone using the
selective T-type calcium channel blocker mibefradil. Isolated perfused hyd
ronephrotic rat kidneys were used for direct visualization of renal microci
rculation. Administration of Ang II (0.3 nmol/L) caused marked constriction
of afferent (from 13.5+/-0.6 to 9.2+/-0.6 mum, P<0.01, n=6) and efferent (
from 11.5+/-1.0 to 7.4+/-0.7 <mu>m, P<0.01, n=5) arterioles. Mibefradil (1
<mu>mol/L) dilated both vessels, with 82+/-11% and 72+/-7% reversal of affe
rent and efferent arterioles, respectively. Similarly, nickel chloride (100
mu mol/L) caused dilation of both arterioles, similar in magnitude in affe
rent (68+/-10%, n=7) and efferent (80+/-7%, n=7) arterioles. To eliminate t
he possibility that the mibefradil-induced dilation was mediated by L-type
channel blockade, mibefradil was administered in the presence of nifedipine
(1 mu mol/L). Thus, nifedipine caused modest efferent arteriolar dilation
(30+/-6% reversal, n=9), and subsequent addition of mibefradil elicited fur
ther dilation of this vessel (80+/-4%, P<0.01 versus nifedipine). Furthermo
re, mibefradil reversed the Ang II-induced efferent arteriolar constriction
even in the presence of nifedipine and phentolamine. These findings demons
trate that T-type calcium antagonists markedly dilate the Ang II-induced ef
ferent arteriolar constriction, but the action is not mediated by inhibitio
n of catecholamine release. This potent activity would contribute to the ef
ferent arteriolar response to nilvadipine and efonidipine and may offer ben
efit in light of glomerular hemodynamics.