Comparison of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and amplified fragment-length polymorphism for epidemiological investigations of common nosocomial pathogens
Emc. D'Agata et al., Comparison of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and amplified fragment-length polymorphism for epidemiological investigations of common nosocomial pathogens, INFECT CONT, 22(9), 2001, pp. 550-554
OBJECTIVE: To compare molecular typing by amplified fragment-length polymor
phism (AFLP) analysis with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with res
pect to the ability to differentiate between epidemiologically related and
unrelated isolates of common nosocomial pathogens recovered during a period
of endemicity.
DESIGN: Retrospective laboratory analysis.
SETTING: Tertiary-care institution.
METHODS: 17 isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii, 22 isolates of Pseudomonas
aeruginosa, and 22 vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) were ty
ped by both methods.
RESULTS: AFLP generated comparable results to PFGE for A baumannii and P ae
ruginosa isolates; both methods identified epidemiologically related and un
related isolates. However, strain typing of VRE isolates produced discordan
t results between the two methods. PFGE identified 10 different strain type
s and differentiated between all epidemiologically related and unrelated is
olates. In contrast, AFLP generated only five different strain types, three
of which contained both epidemiologically related and unrelated isolates.
CONCLUSION: Molecular typing by AFLP is comparable to PFGE for A baumannii
and P aeruginosa isolates. For VRE isolates, however, PFGE remains the meth
od of choice (Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:550-554).