J. Chladek et al., Bioequivalence of two rimantadine tablet formulations in healthy male volunteers after single dose administration, INT J CL PH, 39(4), 2001, pp. 179-184
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS
Aim: The bioequivalence of two rimantadine tablet formulations was determin
ed. Methods: The study was designed as a randomized, two-period, two-sequen
ce, crossover study. Twenty-four healthy male volunteers received a single
100 mg; dose of rimantadine hydrochloride as test (Rimantadin Lachema 100 t
bl. obd., produced by Lachema, a.s., Brno, Czech Republic) and reference fo
rmulations (Flumadine 100 tbl. obd., produced by Forest Pharmaceuticals, St
. Louis, USA). The two administrations were separated by 14 days and were p
erformed in the fasting state. Blood samples were obtained at 15 time point
s during the interval 0 - 120 h after administration. Rimantadine plasma co
ncentrations were determined by gas chromatography with electron-capture de
tection. Results: The geometric mean concentration-time profiles of rimanta
dine after administration of the two formulations were superimposable. The
following pharmacokinetic parameters refer to the geometric mean [exp(mean
SD)] values for the test and reference formulations, respectively: C-max (n
g/ml) 70.5 (60.0 - 82.7) vs. 70.0 (59.9 to 81.7), AUC(0-infinity) (ng x h/m
l) 2872 (2224 to 3707) vs. 2849 (2195 - 3699), AUC(0-120h) 2744 (2184 - 344
8) vs. 2712 (2138 - 3441), t(1/2) (it) 25.8 (20.1 - 33.0) vs. 25.7 (20.6 to
32.1). Median (range) t(max) (h) values were 4.5 (2.0 - 8.0) and 6.0 (10 -
8.0). parametric 90% confidence intervals for the expected mean percentage
ratios (test/reference) of the pharmacokinetic variables were within the r
ange of 97% to 105%. The median (91.1% confidence interval) difference in t
(max) was -0.3 h (-2.0 -0.5). The point and interval estimates were identic
al when truncated AUCs (0-96 h, 0-72 h, 0-48 h and 0-24 h) were used in cal
culations. Conclusion: The two rimantadine formulations were equivalent in
both the rate and extent of bioavailability and they were also well tolerat
ed. This study confirms the findings of other studies showing that for imme
diate release formulations of drugs with long half-lives shortening the dur
ation over which blood samples are collected improves the economics, is mor
e ethical and does not impair the quality of data.