D. Manca et al., APPLICATION OF A PREDICTIVE APPROACH TO ESTIMATE EXPOSURE TO NONSMOKING URBAN SUBPOPULATIONS TO BACKGROUND LEVELS OF BENZENE IN ONTARIO, Human and ecological risk assessment, 3(3), 1997, pp. 415-437
An indirect approach was used to estimate exposure to background level
s of atmospheric benzene for a selection of Ontario non-smoking urban
subpopulations. Activity codes obtained from nationally representative
time-budget surveys were allocated to five general microenvironments
(home, work (or school), outdoors, commuting, and other indoors) and f
urther combined with inhalation rates corresponding to specific levels
of physical activity in order to develop average activity patterns fo
r six sub-populations believed to be differently exposed to atmospheri
c benzene in urban areas (children, teenagers, office workers, outdoor
workers, transit workers, and seniors). These activity patterns were
then combined with representative concentrations of benzene measured i
n the selected microenvironments in Ontario in order to evaluate expos
ure. Two metrics were used for this purpose, integrated exposure and p
otential average daily dose (intake). Potential lifetime average daily
doses were also estimated for three composite subgroups representing
average office, outdoor, and transit workers. A probabilistic approach
using a Monte-Carlo sampling procedure was used in order to estimate
possible ranges of exposures experienced by the various sub-population
s, Results obtained suggested that the highest daily integrated exposu
re (mean: 131 mu g-hrs/m(3)) was associated with the average transit w
orker while comparable levels were estimated for the other sub-populat
ions investigated (mean: 77-86 mu g-hrs/m(3)). These levels correspond
ed to 24-hours time-weighted average (TWA) -equivalent concentrations
of 5.5 mu g/m(3) and 5.5 mu g/m(3), respectively. Statistical distribu
tions of integrated exposures obtained with the probabilistic approach
indicated levels as high as 343 mu g-hrs/m(3) (97.5th percentile) in
the case of the average transit worker, corresponding to TWA-equivalen
ts in excess of 15 mu g/m(3) When levels of physical activities and in
halation rates were integrated in the calculation of exposure, the hig
hest potential average daily dose was found to be associated with the
average child (mean: 3.1 mu g/kg-day; 97.5th percentile: 6.0 mu g/kg-d
ay) whereas comparable amounts were estimated for teenager and transit
workers (mean: 2.1 CI mu g/kg-day; 97.5th: 4.1 and 6.9 mu g/kg-day, r
espectively). Indoor microenvironments (home, office/school, other ind
oors) were identified as the major contributors to total exposure and
intake of benzene (greater than or equal to 50%) although their relati
ve importance varied depending on the exposure metric utilized. Potent
ial lifetime average daily doses estimated for transit workers varied
from 2.1 (mean) to 5.4 (97.5th) mu g/kg-day. This was slightly higher
than those estimated for the average office and outdoor workers (mean:
1.5-1.7 mu g/kg-day). These projections suggest that average non-smok
ing children and teenagers are the most exposed sub-populations among
those investigated to background levels of atmospheric benzene as a re
sult of their daily activities. However, these projections must be int
erpreted with caution in view of uncertainties associated with some of
the assumptions adopted, the limited database used to document benzen
e levels, and as a result of unaccounted sources of emissions which, u
nder certain circumstances, can significantly modify these conclusions
.