Jm. Roesink et al., Quantitative dose-volume response analysis of changes in parotid gland function after radiotherapy in the head-and-neck region, INT J RAD O, 51(4), 2001, pp. 938-946
Citations number
50
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
Purpose: To study the radiation tolerance of the parotid glands as a functi
on of dose and volume irradiated.
Methods and Materials: One hundred eight patients treated with primary or p
ostoperative radiotherapy for various malignancies in the head-and-neck reg
ion were prospectively evaluated. Stimulated parotid flow rate was measured
before radiotherapy and 6 weeks, 6 months, and I year after radiotherapy.
Parotid gland dose-volume histograms were derived from CT-based treatment p
lanning. The normal tissue complication probability model proposed by Lyman
was fit to the data. A complication was defined as stimulated parotid flow
rate < 25% of the preradiotherapy flow rate.
Results: The mean stimulated preradiotherapy flow rate of 174 parotid gland
s was 0.34 mL/min. The mean flow rate reduced to 0.12 mL/min 6 weeks postra
diotherapy, but recovered to a mean flow rate of 0.20 mL/min at I year afte
r radiotherapy. Reduction in postradiotherapy flow rate correlated signific
antly with mean parotid dose. No threshold dose was found. Increasing the i
rradiated volume of parotid glands from 0%-40% to 90-100% in patients with
a mean parotid dose of 35-45 Gy resulted in a decrease in flow ratio from,
respectively, approximately 100% to less than 10% 6 weeks after radiation.
The flow ratio of the 90%-100% group partially recovered to 15% at 6 months
and to 30% at I year after radiotherapy. The normal tissue complication pr
obability model parameter TD50 (the dose to the whole organ leading to a co
mplication probability of 50%) was found to be 31, 35, and 39 Gy at 6 weeks
, 6 months, and I year postradiotherapy, respectively. The volume dependenc
y parameter n was around 1, which means that the mean parotid dose correlat
es best with the observed complications. There was no steep dose-response c
urve (m = 0.45 at I year post radiotherapy).
Conclusions: This study on dose/volume/parotid gland function relationships
revealed a linear correlation between postradiotherapy flow ratio and paro
tid gland dose and a strong volume dependency. No threshold dose was found.
Recovery of parotid gland function was shown at 6 months and I year after
radiotherapy. In radiation planning, attempts should be made to achieve a m
ean parotid gland dose at least below 39 Gy (leading to a complication prob
ability of 50%). (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc.