A. Pritchard et D. Kendrick, Practice nurse and health visitor management of acute minor illness in a general practice, J ADV NURS, 36(4), 2001, pp. 556-562
Objective. To evaluate practice nurse (PN) and health visitor (HV) manageme
nt of patients with acute minor illnesses, monitor the effect on general pr
actitioner (GP) workload, and describe the range of conditions seen by nurs
es.
Design. Patients requesting 'urgent' appointments (within 24 hours) were of
fered consultations with a PN or HV trained in the management of acute mino
r illness. Comparative data were collected before and after the establishme
nt of the acute minor illness service.
Setting. A general practice in Nottingham, England.
Main outcome measures. Patient satisfaction, consultation rate, prescriptio
ns, investigations, referrals and urgent re-consultations for the same cond
ition within 2 weeks.
Results. About 2056 urgent consultations were recorded in the study period,
of which 332 (16.1%) were seen by PNs and 46 (2.2%) by a HV. High levels o
f patient satisfaction were reported for all health professionals. Patients
seeing the HV reported higher levels of satisfaction than those consulting
GPs (P=0.033) and PNs (P=0.010). There was no difference by health profess
ional for prescription rates W=0.76), re-consultations (P=0.14), or referra
ls to secondary care (P=0.07). General practitioners were more likely to in
itiate further investigations than the PNs or HV (P < 0.001).
Conclusion. With suitable training, PNs and HVs can successfully manage pat
ients with a range of conditions. General practitioner workload can be redu
ced while maintaining high patient satisfaction levels.