U. Haberkorn et al., PET 2-FLUORO-2-DEOXYGLUCOSE UPTAKE IN RAT PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA DURING CHEMOTHERAPY WITH GEMCITABINE, The Journal of nuclear medicine, 38(8), 1997, pp. 1215-1221
This study was performed to investigate the effect of the new chemothe
rapeutic agent gemcitabine on glucose transport and metabolism in pros
tate carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. Methods: After transplantation of
rat prostate adenocarcinoma cells, dynamic PET measurements with fluo
rine-18-labeled 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)FDG) were performed in
15 animals before and 1 day after therapy with 90 mg/kg of body weigh
t (n = 8) and 180 mg/kg of body weight (n = 7) gemcitabine. In the sec
ond examination, the animals received a simultaneous injection of (18)
FDG and [H-3]thymidine. Quantitative evaluation of the PET data was do
ne using the standardized uptake value (SUV) as well as a three-compar
tment pharmacokinetic model. Furthermore, the incorporation of [H-3]th
ymidine into the DNA was determined. In vitro measurements of the FDG,
3-O-methylglucose and thymidine uptake were performed immediately and
4 hr after a 24-hr incubation period with different doses of gemcitab
ine, Results: FDG-SUV and the metabolic rate of FDG utilization did no
t change significantly after therapy. However, the values for the tran
sport rate constants K-1 and k(2) increased significantly. The incorpo
ration of thymidine into the DNA of treated tumors showed an 80% decli
ne as compared with a control group, In the cell culture experiments,
a dose-dependent increase of FDG (up to 178%) and 3-O-methylglucose up
take (up to 305%) was demonstrated. The thymidine uptake showed a 96%
decline in the nucleic acid fraction and an increase of up to 337% in
the cytoplasmic fraction. Conclusion: The more global measures of FDG
metabolism as SUV and metabolic rate of FDG utilization were unchanged
after therapy, while DNA synthesis and cell viability declined. Howev
er, in vitro and in vivo evidence of an enhancement of glucose transpo
rt is presented, indicating that quantification by modeling may be sup
erior for the evaluation of metabolic effects during chemotherapy.