Rjpm. Scholten et al., The accuracy of physical diagnostic tests for assessing meniscal lesions of the knee - A meta-analysis, J FAM PRACT, 50(11), 2001, pp. 938-944
OBJECTIVE Our systematic review summarizes die evidence about the accuracy
of physical diagnostic tests for assessing meniscal lesions of the knee.
SEARCH STRATEGY We performed a literature search of MEDLINE (1966-1999) and
EMBASE (1988-1999) with additional reference tracking.
SELECTION CRITERIA Articles written in English, French, German, or Dutch th
at addressed the accuracy of at least one physical diagnostic test for meni
scus injury with arthrotomy, arthroscopy, or magnetic resonance imaging as
the gold standard were included.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers independently selected studies,
assessed the methodologic quality, and abstracted data using a standardized
protocol.
MAIN RESULTS Thirteen studies (of 402) met the inclusion criteria. The resu
lts of the index and reference tests, were assessed independently (blindly)
of each other in only 2 studies, and in all studies verification bias seem
ed to be present. The study results were highly heterogeneous. The summary
receiver operating characteristic curves of the assessment of joint effusio
n, the McMurray test, and joint line tenderness indicated little discrimina
tive power for these tests. Only the predictive Value of a positive McMurra
y test was favorable.
CONCLUSIONS The methodologic quality of studies addressing the diagnostic a
ccuracy of meniscal tests was poor, and the results were highly heterogeneo
us. The poor characteristics indicate that these tests are of little value
for clinical practice.