This report has been prepared in response to a request from the U.S. Depart
ment of Energy's (DOE) Office of Fusion Energy Sciences to consider possibl
e alternatives on reduced cost options for "next-step" devices. A central f
ocus of next-step devices is the study of "burning" plasmas, which explore
the impact of substantial fusion energy production via the deuterium-tritiu
m reaction.
An important part of the U.S. Fusion Energy Sciences Program is its partici
pation in the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) progr
am. Taking into account the international situation and U.S. domestic issue
s, the ITER process is exploring reduced-cost options to the present ITER d
evice. A Special Working Group, reporting to the ITER Council, has been for
med to explore these issues on behalf of the ITER Parties, i.e., the Europe
an Union, Russian Federation, Japan, and the United States. This report and
its related activities will aid the United States in the international pro
cess.
This report is the result of a broad-based U.S. community effort to discuss
, debate, and work together on the crucial issues involved in considering n
ext-step options. The main content of this report is based on three potenti
al pathways identified at a broadly attended community Forum for Next-Step
Fusion Experiments (University of Wisconsin, Madison, April 1998) organized
principally by the University Fusion Association and by the work of the IT
ER Steering Committee-US (ISCUS) on reduced cost ITER options. The Madison
Workshop was followed by a smaller Workshop on Next-Step Options (Universit
y of California, San Diego, June 1998) to focus on preparing this report. A
broadly-announced Website was established to facilitate access to document
s related to this process.