St. Bogardus et al., What does the medical record reveal about functional status? A comparison of medical record and interview data, J GEN INT M, 16(11), 2001, pp. 728-736
OBJECTIVE: Functional status measures are potent independent predictors of
hospital outcomes and mortality. The study objective was to compare medical
record with interview data for functional status.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Subjects were 525 medical patients, aged 70 years or
older, hospitalized at an academic medical center. Patient interviews deter
mined status for 7 basic activities of daily living (BADLs) and 7 instrumen
tal activities of daily living (IADLs). Medical records were reviewed to as
sess documentation of BADLs and IADLs.
RESULTS: Most medical records contained no documentation of individual BADL
s and IADLs (61% to 98% of records lacking documentation), with the excepti
on of walking (24% of medical records lacking documentation). Impairment pr
evalence was lower in medical records than at interview for all BADLs and L
ADLs, and agreement between interview and medical record was poor (kappa <
0.40 for individual BADLs and IADLs). Sensitivity of the medical record for
BADL and IADL impairment was poor (range 95% to 44%), using the interview
as a reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity of the medical record
for detection of BADL and IADL impairment changed substantially when record
s with nondocumentation of functional status were excluded or were assumed
to be equivalent to independence.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the medical record is a poor source o
f data on many functional status measures, and that assuming that nondocume
ntation of functional status is equivalent to independence may be unwarrant
ed. Given the prognostic importance of functional status measures, the resu
lts highlight the importance of developing reliable and efficient means of
obtaining functional status information on hospitalized older patients.