Integrated effects of the vasodilating beta-blocker nebivolol on exercise performance, energy metabolism, cardiovascular and neurohormonal parametersin physically active patients with arterial hypertension
Hg. Predel et al., Integrated effects of the vasodilating beta-blocker nebivolol on exercise performance, energy metabolism, cardiovascular and neurohormonal parametersin physically active patients with arterial hypertension, J HUM HYPER, 15(10), 2001, pp. 715-721
Objective. The present study was designed to investigate the integrated eff
ects of the beta-1-selective blocker with vasodilator properties, nebivolol
, on systemic haemodynamics, neurohormones and energy metabolism as well as
oxygen uptake and exercise performance in physically active patients with
moderate essential hypertension (EH).
Design and methods: Eighteen physically active patients with moderate EH we
re included: age: 46.9 +/- 2.38 years, weight: 83.9 +/- 2.81 kg, blood pres
sure (BP): 155.8 +/- 3.90/102.5 +/- 1.86 mm Hg, heart rate: 73.6 +/- 2.98 m
in(-1). After a 14-day wash-out period a bicycle spiroergometry until exhau
stion (WHO) was performed followed by a 45-min submaximal exercise test on
the 2.5 mmol/l lactate-level 48 h later. Before, during and directly after
exercise testing blood samples were taken. An identical protocol was repeat
ed after a 6-week treatment period with 5 mg nebivolol/day.
Results: Nebivolol treatment resulted in a significant (P < 0.01) decrease
in systolic and diastolic BP and heart rate at rest and during maximal and
submaximal exercise. Maximal physical work performance, blood lactate and r
el. oxygen uptake (rel. VO2) before and after nebivolol treatment at rest a
nd during maximal and submaximal exercise remained unaltered. Free fatty ac
id, free glycerol, plasma catecholamines, beta-endorphines and atrial natri
uretic peptide (ANP) increased before and after treatment during maximal an
d submaximal exercise but remained unaltered by nebivolol treatment. In con
trast, plasma ANP levels at rest were significantly higher in the presence
of nebivolol, endothelin-1 levels were unchanged.
Conclusions. Nebivolol was effective in the control of BP at rest and durin
g exercise in patients with EH. Furthermore, nebivolol did not negatively a
ffect lipid and carbohydrate metabolism and substrate flow. The explanation
for the effects on ANP at rest remain elusive. This pharmacodynamic profil
e of nebivolol is potentially suitable in physically active patients with E
H.