A review of the classic and recent evidence on the genetics of reading disa
bility (RD) shows encouraging progress, and accumulating evidence of geneti
c risk factors that operate within families and are separately localizable
to more than one chromosomal region. The accelerating pace of these finding
s, however, suggests the need to consider some methodological issues about
the design and interpretation of current and future studies. A major issue
is the shape of the distribution of reading ability in the population, and
we offer three tests of increasing rigor for determining whether those dist
ributions are categorical, and hence not suitable for analyses that depend
on the assumption of a continuous normal distribution. These tests are as f
ollows: a nonnormal preponderance of cases with RD (i.e., the hump in the l
ower end of the distribution); a difference in the within-group variance-co
variance matrices for typical readers compared to those with RD; and a corr
elation between a neurogenetically relevant criterion and a categorical rea
ding variable that is larger than the correlation between the same criterio
n and a continuous version of the same reading variable. We emphasize also
the importance of interactive relationships between multiple genetic loci,
the variations in genotypic range as well as type of affectedness, the need
to account for remediation variance, and the importance of lifespan change
s in the phenotypes.