Image-derived input functions for determination of MRGlu in cardiac F-18-FDG PET scans

Citation
Ap. Van Der Weerdt et al., Image-derived input functions for determination of MRGlu in cardiac F-18-FDG PET scans, J NUCL MED, 42(11), 2001, pp. 1622-1629
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
ISSN journal
01615505 → ACNP
Volume
42
Issue
11
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1622 - 1629
Database
ISI
SICI code
0161-5505(200111)42:11<1622:IIFFDO>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Image-derived input functions (IDIF) are frequently used in cardiac F-18-FD G PET studies for determination of the myocardial metabolic rate of glucose (MRGIu). The purpose of this study was to assess which vascular structure is most suited for defining the IDIF, using online arterial blood sampling (AS) as the gold standard. Methods: In 18 patients with ischemic heart dise ase, 370 MBq FDG were injected during a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp. Studies were performed with a Siemens/CTI HR+ PET scanner using a dynamic s canning protocol. A fully automated blood-sampling device was used for cont inuous AS. IDIF were obtained using regions of interest (ROIs) of 3 differe nt sizes defined on the left ventricle (LV), left atrium (LA), ascending ao rta (AA), and descending aorta (DA). MRGIu was calculated with all input fu nctions. Ratios between MRGIu obtained with IDIF and AS were calculated for each patient. Results: Time-activity curves from smaller ROIs suffered mor e from statistical noise with only a modest reduction of spillover effects, which led to more variation in calculated MRGIu. Mean ratios of MRGIu obta ined with IDIF and AS were close to 1 when AA and DA (0.97 +/- 0.07 and 1.0 0 +/- 0.11, respectively) were used to define the input function. However, when LA and LV were used, mean ratios were 0.81 +/- 0.06 and 0.79 +/- 0.08, respectively, reflecting a significant underestimation of MRGIu. The use o f AA for defining the input function resulted in the best agreement with AS and the smallest interobserver variation. Conclusion: The ascending aorta is the structure of choice for defining IDIF and a large ROI (diameter, app roximately 15 mm) should be used to minimize the effects of statistical noi se.