Many studies have used pharmacokinetic (compartment) models for skin to pre
dict or analyze dermal absorption of chemicals. Comparing these models is d
ifficult because the relationships between rate constants and the physicoch
emical parameters were not always defined clearly, simplifying assumptions
built into models sometimes were not stated, and which skin layers were inc
luded often were not specified. In this paper we review and compare publish
ed one- and two-compartment models for which rate constants were expressed
in terms of the physicochemical and physical properties of the skin (i.e.,
diffusion coefficients, partition coefficients and thickness). Nine one-com
partment and two two-compartment models are presented with a consistent nom
enclature and clearly defined assumptions. In addition, methods used for es
timating the physicochemical parameters required by the various models are
summarized. These eleven compartment models are compared with calculations
from a two-membrane skin model that corresponds better with skin function.
Many of the compartment models do not predict key characteristics of the tw
o-membrane skin model, especially the effect of blood flow on skin concentr
ation and penetration rates, even when the same input parameters were used.
The compartment models developed by Kubota and by McCarley are better pred
ictors of the two-membrane model results, because these models were develop
ed to match characteristics of the membrane model. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc
. and the American Pharmaceutical Association.