Two portable light sources, comprising light emitting diodes (LEDs) of two
different wavelengths, were compared to a standard light box in suppressing
and phase shifting nocturnal salivary melatonin. All light sources were eq
uated for illuminance of 2000 lux. Sixty-six volunteers participated in the
2-day study and were randomly allocated to one of four conditions; light b
ox. white LED, blue/green LED. or no light control group. Light was adminis
tered to the experimental groups from midnight to 02.00 hr on the first nig
ht. Half-hourly saliva samples were collected from 19.00 to 02.00 hr on nig
ht 1 and until 01.00 hr on night 2. Percent melatonin suppression on night
1 and dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) for each night were calculated. The
experimental groups showed significant melatonin suppression during light s
timulation, with the blue/green LEDs producing the greatest (70%) suppressi
on. There was no significant difference between the light box at 63% and wh
ite LED at 50% suppression. Similarly, the blue/green LED had a significant
ly greater DLMO delay of 42 min and no difference between the light box of
23 min and the white LED of 22 min. These data suggest the portable LED lig
ht source is an effective way of delivering light to phase shift the melato
nin rhythm, with the blue/green LED being the more effective of the two LED
s.