Disturbed atrioventricular electromechanical function long after mustard operation for transposition of great arteries: A potential contributing factor to atrial flutter
W. Li et al., Disturbed atrioventricular electromechanical function long after mustard operation for transposition of great arteries: A potential contributing factor to atrial flutter, J AM S ECHO, 14(11), 2001, pp. 1088-1093
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
Objective: The objectives were to study atrial and ventricular electromecha
nical function in patients long after Mustard repair for transposition of g
reat arteries and to identify possible causes and physiologic disturbances
in those with recurrent atrial flutter.
Methods: Electromechanical atrial and ventricular function was assessed in
22 patients (11 women) aged 27 +/- 5 years, 10 to 29 (mean 24) years after
initial Mustard operation with electrocardiography and echocardiography. Th
e study subjects involved 12 patients with documented atrial flutter and th
e remaining 10 without history of atrial arrhythmia served as controls. All
patients were studied while in sinus rhythm.
Results. There was no difference in age, gender, or age at original Mustard
surgery between the 2 patient groups. The P wave and QRS duration were sig
nificantly broader in patients compared with controls (128 +/- 14 ms vs 100
+/- 10 ms, P < .05 and 120 20 ins vs 93 6 ins, P < .01). Right ventricular
end diastolic dimension was not different, whereas left ventricular fracti
on shortening was less (20% +/- 10% vs 35% +/- 12%, P < .01) in the patient
group. Left and septal total ventricular long axes amplitude were signific
antly lower in patients compared with controls (1.4 +/- 0.4 cm vs 1.7 +/- 0
.3 cm, P < .05 and 0.6 +/- 0.2 cm vs 1.0 +/- 0.3 cm, P < .01). Right-sided
total long axis excursion was equally reduced in the 2 groups (1.0 +/- 0.3
cm). Septal and right-sided but not left-sided 'a' wave was smaller in the
patients (1.2 +/- 1 nun vs 3 +/- 1.2 mm, P < .001 and 1 +/- 1.3 min vs 3 +/
- 0.9 mm, P < .01). Right atrial electromechanical delay was significantly
longer in patients with respect to controls (110 +/- 14 ins vs 84 +/- 25 in
s, P < .001), but on the left there was no difference. The P wave duration
correlated closely with right atrial electromechanical delay, r = 0.79, P <
003. Significant tricuspid regurgitation was found in 9 of 12 patients but
none of the controls.
Conclusion: Right ventricular dysfunction is present long after Mustard ope
ration for transposition of great arteries whether flutter occurs. However,
in patients with history of atrial flutter, evidence of left ventricular d
ysfunction, significant tricuspid regurgitation, impaired right atrial elec
trical and mechanical function, and reversed onset of atrial systole is als
o present. The consistent association of the disturbed atrial and ventricul
ar electromechanical behavior suggests a multifactorial etiology for atrial
arrhythmia.