Ta. Roeleveld et al., Surveillance can be the standard of care for stage I nonseminomatous testicular tumors and even high risk patients, J UROL, 166(6), 2001, pp. 2166-2170
Purpose: We investigate the results of a surveillance program for stage I n
onseminomatous germ cell tumors to validate a surveillance policy, and furt
hermore improve it by analyzing diagnostic instruments and identifying prog
nostic factors for relapse.
Materials and Methods: From 1982 to 1994, 90 patients with stage I nonsemin
omatous germ cell tumors entered a surveillance protocol after orchiectomy.
Patients with relapse were treated with cisplatin based chemotherapy. A st
atistical analysis of possible prognostic factors for relapse was performed
.
Results: Relapse occurred in 23 (26%) patients. Disease specific survival w
as 98.9%, and 1 patient died of tumor. Most relapses were located in retrop
eritoneal lymph nodes only (78%). Tumor markers were the most important ind
icators of relapse. However, in 22% of patients with relapse abdominal x-ra
y of lymphangiographic contrast showed the first sign of relapse. Computeri
zed tomography located all but 1 relapse. Vascular invasion (p = 0.0001), t
umor size (p = 0.0341) and presence of immature teratoma (p = 0.0154) were
significantly predictive of relapse with the multivariate analysis, percent
age embryonal carcinoma only by univariate analysis (p = 0.032). The relaps
e rate was highest (52%) when vascular invasion was present.
Conclusions: With surveillance for stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors
, excellent treatment results can be achieved that are comparable to primar
y retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Tumor markers and computerized tom
ography are highly reliable for detecting relapse. Lymphangiography is stil
l of staging value. Pathological factors may influence the choice of adjuva
nt treatment. However, relapse risks of 50% to 60% are maximally achieved w
ith presently available prognostic factors, and so sparing morbidity of adj
uvant treatment by a surveillance protocol remains a feasible option even i
n these patients.