Sales and science: Changing patterns of pharmaceutical and medical device advertising in peer reviewed urology publications, 1975-2000

Citation
Cp. Nelson et Da. Bloom, Sales and science: Changing patterns of pharmaceutical and medical device advertising in peer reviewed urology publications, 1975-2000, J UROL, 166(6), 2001, pp. 2317-2320
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
ISSN journal
00225347 → ACNP
Volume
166
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
2317 - 2320
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-5347(200112)166:6<2317:SASCPO>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Purpose: The effects of advertising on urological practice are controversia l. We studied patterns of pharmaceutical and medical device marketing in pe er reviewed urological journals in 1975 and 2000. Materials and Methods: Pharmaceutical and medical device advertising in 1 E uropean and 2 American peer reviewed urological journals were evaluated in 4 randomly selected issues of each journal published in 1975 and 2000, resp ectively. Advertising quantity and the qualitative characteristics of each advertisement were analyzed. Results: We analyzed 574 advertisements in 24 issues. Advertising decreased between 1975 and 2000 based on the number of pages per issue (55.3 to 31.9 , p = 0.04), number of advertisements per issue (30.4 to 17.4, p = 0.0098) and the ratio of advertising-to-scientific pages (0.399 to 0.151, p = 0.001 6). Mean advertisement length was stable at 1.8 pages. The top 3 advertiser s in 1975 were Eaton, Roche and Warner compared with Pfizer, AstraZeneca an d Merck in 2000. Advertising for antibiotics comprised 70.3% of all pharmac eutical advertisements in 1975 but only 15.2% in 2000 (p = 0.0001), while a dvertising for benign prostatic hyperplasia, erectile dysfunction and hormo nal therapy increased sharply. Nutritional supplement marketing increased f rom 0.5% of all advertisements in 1975 to 4.3% in 2000 (p = 0.0026). The in cidence of advertisements citing peer reviewed literature increased from 16 .7% to 33% (p = 0.0001) with a greater increase in the European than in the American journals. Conclusions: Advertising in peer reviewed urological,journals has decreased since 1975 and fewer companies now market more products. :Few advertisemen ts cite the scientific literature. Better understanding of pharmaceutical m arketing patterns may improve awareness of these efforts to influence physi cian practice.