K. Read et al., Molecular phylogeny of the Australian frog genera Crinia, Geocrinia, and allied taxa (Anura : Myobatrachidae), MOL PHYL EV, 21(2), 2001, pp. 294-308
We present a mitochondrial gene tree for representative species of all the
genera in the subfamily Myobatrachinae, with special emphasis on Crinia and
Geocrinia. This group has been the subject of a number of long-standing ta
xonomic and phylogenetic debates. Our phylogeny is based on data from appro
ximately 780 bp of 12S rRNA and 676 bp of ND2, and resolves a number of the
se problems. We confirm that the morphologically highly derived monotypic g
enera Metacrinia, Myobatrachus, and Arenophryne are closely related, and th
at Pseudophryne forms the sister group to these genera. Uperoleia and the r
ecently described genus Spicospina are also part of this clade. Our data sh
ow that Assa and Geocrinia are reciprocally monophyletic and together they
form a well-supported clade. Geocrinia is monophyletic and the phylogenetic
relationships with the genus are fully resolved with two major species gro
ups identified: G. leai G. victoriana, and G. laevis; and G. rosea, G. alba
, and G. vitellina (we were unable to sample G. lutea). We confirm that Tau
dactylus forms the sister group to the other myobatrachine genera, but our
data are equivocal on the phylogenetic position of Paracrinia. The phylogen
etic relationships among Crinia species are well resolved with strong suppo
rt for a number of distinct monophyletic clades, but more data are required
to resolve relationships among these major Crinia clades. Crinia tasmanien
sis and Bryobatrachus nimbus form the sister clade to the rest of Crinia. D
ue to the lack of generic level synapomorphies for a Bryobatrachus that inc
ludes C. tasmaniensis, we synonymize Bryobatrachus with Crinia. Crinia geor
giana does not form a clade distinct from other Crinia species and so our d
ata do not support recognition of the genus Ranidella for other Crinia spec
ies. Crinia subinsignifera, C. pseudinsignifera, and C. insignifera are ext
remely closely related despite differences in male advertisement call. A pr
eliminary investigation of phylogeographic substructure within C. signifera
revealed significant divergence between samples from across the range of t
his species. (C) 2001 Academic Press.