Purpose. The difference between high- and low-contrast visual acuity provid
es a sensitive indicator of vision loss in ocular disease; however, the eff
ect of refractive error correction on this difference is still debated. Met
hods. High- and low-contrast visual acuity was measured in 116 rigid gas pe
rmeable contact lens wearers, 51 spectacle wearers, and 50 soft contact len
s wearers with habitual and best correction. Twenty-nine of the soft contac
t lens wearers reported that they wore disposable contact lenses (discarded
on a monthly or more frequent basis), whereas the other 21 soft contact le
ns wearers wore traditional soft contact lenses. Results. Rigid gas permeab
le contact lens wearers had statistically worse high-contrast habitual visu
al acuity than spectacle wearers (Tukey-Kramer, p = 0.0075). Traditional so
ft contact lens wearers had significantly worse low-contrast visual acuity
compared with all other groups (Tukey-Kramer, p < 0.02 for each comparison)
. Traditional soft contact lens wearers had a significantly larger differen
ce between high- and low-contrast visual acuity with best correction compar
ed with rigid gas permeable wearers (Tukey-Kramer, p = 0.0099). Conclusions
. Rigid gas permeable contact lens wearers had statistically worse habitual
high-contrast visual acuity compared with spectacle wearers, but no differ
ence was present under best-corrected conditions. We hypothesize that rigid
gas permeable contact lens wearers were not wearing their optimal correcti
on habitually. Traditional soft contact lens wearers had significantly wors
e low-contrast visual acuity. They also had a larger difference between the
ir best-corrected high- and low-contrast visual acuity scores compared with
rigid gas permeable contact lens wearers.