B. Rind, P. Tromovitch, and R. Bauserman (1998) examined the long-term effe
cts of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) by meta-analyzing studies of college st
udents. The authors reported that effects "were neither pervasive nor typic
ally intense" and that "men reacted much less negatively than women" (p. 22
) and recommended value-neutral reconceptualization of the CSA construct. T
he current analysis revealed numerous problems in that study that minimized
CSA-adjustment relations, including use of a healthy sample, an inclusive
definition of CSA, failure to correct for statistical attenuation, and misr
eporting of original data. Rind et al.'s study's main conclusions were not
supported by the original data. As such, attempts to use their study to arg
ue that an individual has not been harmed by sexual abuse constitute a seri
ous misapplication of its findings.