Although some recent literature suggests religious social service agencies
can help governments reach important social program goals, the true social
organization and services of the agencies remain in dispute. This article i
nterviews officials in the wide class of "faith-related" agencies in two ci
ties to consider two aspects of this issue: the ties or "coupling" of agenc
ies to faith, and the impact of coupling on agency structure and service pr
ogramming. The results suggest that many sampled agencies are loosely tied
to faith in terms of resources, more tightly coupled in terms of authority
and moderately coupled with respect to culture; that certain aspects of ser
vice-delivery technology are heavily secularized in many agencies; that fai
th is more influential in such matters as the agencies' choices of services
; and that the larger, potentially more secularized agencies that might be
least likely to be characterized as faith based balance differing sets of r
esources and thereby can more fully deliver services that arguably express
faith in action. Given this finding and that most agencies profess a focus
on protecting the dignity and rights of clients rather than on individual r
esponsibility or other themes that are stressed by some recent policy propo
sals, governments need to be extremely selective in funding agencies to pro
mote those proposals' themes.