Gross vs net rates of N mineralization and nitrification as indicators of functional differences between forest types

Citation
Lv. Verchot et al., Gross vs net rates of N mineralization and nitrification as indicators of functional differences between forest types, SOIL BIOL B, 33(14), 2001, pp. 1889-1901
Citations number
50
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
ISSN journal
00380717 → ACNP
Volume
33
Issue
14
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1889 - 1901
Database
ISI
SICI code
0038-0717(200111)33:14<1889:GVNRON>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Floristic species composition and differences in litter quality between spe cies are the primary factors controlling N mineralization in forest ecosyst ems. Generalizations about species effects on N cycling are based on measur ements of net rates of mineralization and nitrification. However, there hav e been few tests on the ability of these measurements to reflect the mechan istic complexity underlying the species effects. The objectives of this stu dy are to: (1) determine whether differences in net mineralization and net nitrification rates between stands of different species composition are due to differences in gross rates of mineralization, nitrification, and microb ial consumption; (2) determine whether field and laboratory assays of net m ineralization and nitrification are useful indicators of internal N dynamic s; and (3) test the hypothesis that microbial immobilization increases with rates of mineralization and nitrification. We measured net rates of minera lization and nitrification in the field and in the laboratory, and gross ra tes of mineralization, nitrification and microbial consumption in different stands at two sites in eastern New York State. The results indicated that vegetation type was not always a robust indicator of N cycling differences between ecosystems. At one site there was no difference in net mineralizati on (P<0.05) between oak and maple stands, and no nitrification in either fo rest type. We attributed this lack of conformity to expected patterns to ei ther differences in soil moisture regimes resulting from landscape position , forest floor disturbance by earthworms, or influences of previous land-us e. At the second site, both beech and maple stands showed significantly gre ater rates of net nitrification than oak stands (P<0.05) and beech had sign ificantly greater (P<0.05) rates of net mineralization than both maple and oak. Gross rates of mineralization, nitrification and microbial consumption were very high and often exceeded net rates by an order of magnitude. Gros s rates were not good indicators of differences between forest types and in most cases we did not find differences in gross rates between stands where we found differences in net rates. We found a strong relationship between microbial consumption of NH4+ or NO3- and gross rates of mineralization or nitrification (R-2=0.83 and R-2=0.52, respectively). (C) 2001 Elsevier Scie nce Ltd. All rights reserved.