Lv. Verchot et al., Gross vs net rates of N mineralization and nitrification as indicators of functional differences between forest types, SOIL BIOL B, 33(14), 2001, pp. 1889-1901
Floristic species composition and differences in litter quality between spe
cies are the primary factors controlling N mineralization in forest ecosyst
ems. Generalizations about species effects on N cycling are based on measur
ements of net rates of mineralization and nitrification. However, there hav
e been few tests on the ability of these measurements to reflect the mechan
istic complexity underlying the species effects. The objectives of this stu
dy are to: (1) determine whether differences in net mineralization and net
nitrification rates between stands of different species composition are due
to differences in gross rates of mineralization, nitrification, and microb
ial consumption; (2) determine whether field and laboratory assays of net m
ineralization and nitrification are useful indicators of internal N dynamic
s; and (3) test the hypothesis that microbial immobilization increases with
rates of mineralization and nitrification. We measured net rates of minera
lization and nitrification in the field and in the laboratory, and gross ra
tes of mineralization, nitrification and microbial consumption in different
stands at two sites in eastern New York State. The results indicated that
vegetation type was not always a robust indicator of N cycling differences
between ecosystems. At one site there was no difference in net mineralizati
on (P<0.05) between oak and maple stands, and no nitrification in either fo
rest type. We attributed this lack of conformity to expected patterns to ei
ther differences in soil moisture regimes resulting from landscape position
, forest floor disturbance by earthworms, or influences of previous land-us
e. At the second site, both beech and maple stands showed significantly gre
ater rates of net nitrification than oak stands (P<0.05) and beech had sign
ificantly greater (P<0.05) rates of net mineralization than both maple and
oak. Gross rates of mineralization, nitrification and microbial consumption
were very high and often exceeded net rates by an order of magnitude. Gros
s rates were not good indicators of differences between forest types and in
most cases we did not find differences in gross rates between stands where
we found differences in net rates. We found a strong relationship between
microbial consumption of NH4+ or NO3- and gross rates of mineralization or
nitrification (R-2=0.83 and R-2=0.52, respectively). (C) 2001 Elsevier Scie
nce Ltd. All rights reserved.