Y. Chen et al., Urine specific gravity and water hardness in relation to urolithiasis in persons with spinal cord injury, SPINAL CORD, 39(11), 2001, pp. 571-576
Study design: A matched case-control study.
Objectives: To clarify the influence of urine specific gravity and drinking
water quality on the formation of urinary stones in persons with spinal co
rd injury (SCI).
Setting: A rehabilitation center within a university hospital.
Methods: Between 1992 and 1998, 63 stone cases (31 kidney, 27 bladder, and
five both) and 289 age-duration-matched controls were recruited from a coho
rt of SCI patients enrolled in an on-going longitudinal study. Data on urin
e specific gravity and other characteristics of study participants were ret
rieved from the database and medical charts. Community water supply informa
tion was provided by the Alabama Department of Environmental Management. Mu
ltivariable conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to evalu
ate the association with stone formation.
Results: SCI individuals who had urinary stones were more likely than contr
ol subjects to use indwelling catheters and have decreased renal function.
The occurrence of stones was not significantly related to gender, race, sev
erity of injury, urinary tract infection, nor urine pH. After controlling f
or the potential confounding from other factors, a continuously increasing
stone occurrence with increasing specific gravity was observed (P=0.05); th
is association was stronger for kidney (odds Ratio [OR]= 1.8 per 0.010 g/cm
(3)) versus bladder stones (OR 1.2) and for recurrent (OR= 2.0) versus firs
t stones (OR= 1.5). Increased water hardness was not significantly associat
ed with a decreased stone occurrence.
Conclusions: Study results suggest that maintaining urine specific gravity
below a certain level might reduce the occurrence of urinary stones. This c
ould be easily achieved by using a dipstick for self-feedback along with ap
propriate fluid intake. For persons with SCI who are at an increased risk o
f a devastating stone disease, this prophylactic approach could be very cos
t-effective; however, this requires further confirmation.