La. Barrie et al., A comparison of large-scale atmospheric sulphate aerosol models (COSAM): overview and highlights, TELLUS B, 53(5), 2001, pp. 615-645
The comparison of large-scale sulphate aerosol models study (COSAM) compare
d the performance of atmospheric models with each other and observations. I
t involved: (i) design of a standard model experiment for the world wide we
b, (ii) 10 model simulations of the cycles of sulphur and Rn-222 Pb-210 con
forming to the experimental design, (iii) assemblage of the best available
observations of atmospheric SO4=, SO2 and MSA and (iv) a workshop in Halifa
x, Canada to analyze model performance and future model development needs.
The analysis presented in this paper and two companion papers by Roelofs, a
nd Lohmann and co-workers examines the variance between models and observat
ions. discusses the sources of that variance and suggests ways to improve m
odels. Variations between models in the export of SOx from Europe or North
America are not sufficient to explain an order of magnitude variation in sp
atial distributions of SOx downwind in the northern hemisphere. On average,
models predicted surface level seasonal mean SO4= aerosol mixing ratios be
tter (most within 20%) than SO2 mixing ratios (over-prediction by factors o
f 2 or more). Results suggest that vertical mixing from the planetary bound
ary layer into the free troposphere in source regions is a major source of
uncertainty in predicting the global distribution of SO aerosols in climate
models today. For improvement. it is essential that globally coordinated r
esearch efforts continue to address emissions of all atmospheric species th
at affect the distribution and optical properties of ambient aerosols in mo
dels and that a global network of observations be established that will ult
imately produce a world aerosol chemistry climatology.