Preoperative chemotherapy and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer

Citation
L. Tafra et al., Preoperative chemotherapy and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer, AM J SURG, 182(4), 2001, pp. 312-315
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
00029610 → ACNP
Volume
182
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
312 - 315
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9610(200110)182:4<312:PCASLF>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Background: Sentinel lymphadenectomy (SL) for breast cancer is becoming the standard of care for selected patients treated by experienced surgeons. On e of the few contraindications for performing SL alone is prior chemotherap y (PC), There are, however, no data to support that PC interferes with the ability of the sentinel node to predict the presence of disease in the rema ining axillary lymph nodes. The goal of this study was to determine the eff ect of PC on patients undergoing SL for breast cancer. Methods: A multicenter trial was organized in 1997 to evaluate the diagnost ic accuracy of SL in patients with breast cancer. Investigators were recrui ted after attending a course on the technique of SL. Technetium-99 and isos ulfan blue were injected into the peritumor region and a gamma probe was us ed to aid identification of the sentinel nodes. The only exclusion criteria for entrance into the trial were palpable or suspicious axillary lymph nod es. A total of 968 patients were enrolled in the trial. Twenty-nine patient s were treated with PC and compared with 939 patients not receiving PC. Results: The overall, sentinel node identification rate for the PC patients was 93% (27 of 29) compared with 88% (822 of 939) for patients not treated with PC. There were no false negatives in those patients receiving PC comp ared with a 13% (25 of 193) false negative rate in those patients not recei ving PC. The mean tumor size was 1.4 cm for the PC group and 0.6 cm for the remaining patients (P <0.005). The mean number of sentinel nodes found was 2.0 for the non-PC group and 2.5 for the PC group (not significant). As ex pected, a higher proportion of patients had positive axillary nodes in the PC group (52%, 15 of 29) compared with the remaining patients (21%, 200 of 939). Conclusion: In this small group of patients, PC did not adversely impact th e false negative or identification rate. Most patients receiving chemothera py have larger tumors and a higher chance of harboring metastatic disease b ut a significant group of these patients (48%) without metastases can poten tially be spared an axillary node dissection. (C) 2001 Excerpta Medica, Inc , All rights reserved.