Background: The role of fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in breast lesi
ons remains uncertain because its accuracy has been questioned. We hypothes
ized that this is related to failure to define standards for adequacy of sa
mple preparation,
Methods: We reviewed cytology and pathology reports from 351 patients under
going FNAB at a 350-bed community, university-affiliated teaching hospital
over a 2-year period. Patients were included if they had an open biopsy wit
hin 2 years of an FNAB of the same lesion. Cytology reports were reviewed b
y a cytopathologist unaware of the clinical setting or subsequent histology
; surgeons unaware of the cytology reports reviewed histology reports. Cyto
logical diagnoses were benign, likely benign, probable cancer, and definite
cancer. Samples were characterized as satisfactory, less than optimal (few
mammary epithelial clusters), or inadequate (no mammary epithelial cluster
s.) We assessed the proportion of inadequate samples, the accuracy of FNAB,
and the influence of sample adequacy upon FNAB sensitivity.
Results: Ninety-nine (28%) FNABs were inadequate, 77 (22%) less than optima
l, and 175 (50%) satisfactory. Ninety-five patients (27%) had a final diagn
osis of malignancy. FNABs classified as satisfactory or less than optimal a
nd characterized as benign (n = 102) had a negative predictive value (NPV)
of 0.91; those termed definite cancer (n = 43) had a positive predictive va
lue (PPV) of 0.98. Only 10% of all cancers were identified in the 28% of FN
ABs that were classified as inadequate (P <0.01).
Conclusions: We concluded that too few FNABs are performed in a fashion tha
t permits definitive cytological interpretation. Inadequate FNABs are less
likely to detect malignancy. After excluding inadequate preparations, FNABs
interpreted as definite cancer and as benign are highly accurate in identi
fying patients with and without cancer. (C) 2001 Excerpta Medica, Inc. All
rights reserved.