Although the elements of a fully stated rule (discriminative Stimulus [S-D]
, some behavior, and a consequence) can occur nearly contemporaneously with
the statement of the rule, there is often a delay between the rule stateme
nt and the SD. The effects of this delay on rule following have not been st
udied in behavior analysis, but they have been investigated in rule-like se
ttings in the areas of prospective memory (remembering to do something in t
he future) and goal pursuit. Discriminative events for some behavior can be
event based (a specific setting stimulus) or time based. The latter are mo
re demanding with respect to intention following and show age-related defic
its. Studies suggest that the specificity with which the components of a ru
le (termed intention) are stated has a substantial effect on intention foll
owing, with more detailed specifications increasing following. Reminders of
an intention, too, are most effective when they refer specifically to both
the behavior and its occasion. Covert review and written notes are two eff
ective strategies for remembering everyday intentions, but people who use n
otes appear not to be able to switch quickly to covert review. By focusing
on aspects of the setting and rule structure, research on prospective memor
y and coal pursuit expands the agenda for a more complete explanation of ru
le effects.