Dissociation between intentional and incidental sequence learning in Huntington's disease

Citation
Rg. Brown et al., Dissociation between intentional and incidental sequence learning in Huntington's disease, BRAIN, 124, 2001, pp. 2188-2202
Citations number
78
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
BRAIN
ISSN journal
00068950 → ACNP
Volume
124
Year of publication
2001
Part
11
Pages
2188 - 2202
Database
ISI
SICI code
0006-8950(200111)124:<2188:DBIAIS>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
The ability to acquire and act upon serial order information is fundamental to almost all forms of adaptive behaviour. There is growing evidence that such knowledge may be acquired through a number of different means, each pe rhaps with its own neuronal substrate. One major distinction is between ser ial order information acquired intentionally and leading to explicit consci ous knowledge of the sequence structure, and information acquired incidenta lly through experience. While this latter form of knowledge influences beha viour, it may do so without the participant being aware of the sequential i nformation, i.e. it is acquired implicitly. Evidence from physiological and lesion studies in animals and imaging studies in humans suggests that thes e two forms of learning may have dissociable neuronal substrates. Specifica lly, the striato-thalamo-cortical circuit centred on the caudate nucleus is proposed to be involved in intentional sequence learning and that based on the putamen on incidental learning. The present study tested one part of t his proposed dissociation by assessing patients with Huntington's disease o n tasks of the two forms of learning. On the test of trial-and-error intent ional learning there were marked deficits, which were closely related to di sease progression and to measures of executive cognitive dysfunction. This finding was in contrast to the finding from the incidental learning task. P erformance of the Huntington's disease group was essentially normal and unr elated to measures of disease progression and cognitive status. The results , although supportive of the proposed dual-system hypothesis, offer only pa rtial confirmation. Further direct study is required using similar tasks in patients with putamenal disorder or lesions within the skeletomotor striat o-thalamo-cortical circuit.