Objectives. The development of a self-report questionnaire capable of asses
sing cognitive and interpersonal vulnerability factors for clinical depress
ion is described. The Vulnerability to Depression Questionnaire (VDQ) was d
eveloped to provide a brief, economical alternative to the Self-Evaluation
and Social Support interview (SESS; O'Connor & Brown, 1984), assessing nega
tive evaluation of self, negative interaction with partner or child and lac
k of a support figure.
Design. The VDQ was tested in a prospective study of community-based women
who were contacted on three occasions over the course of approximately 1 ye
ar, to: (i) compare the VDQ's capacity to categorize vulnerability compared
with the SESS interview, and (ii) to test the VDQ's prediction of onset of
clinical depression during the follow-up.
Method. Selected nondepressed respondents completed the VDQ and were inter-
viewed to determine their vulnerability using the SESS. They were reintervi
ewed on two further occasions during the follow-up period, and the VDQ was
also re-administered at the time of first follow-up. Onset of clinical depr
ession during the follow-up was assessed by interview at each contact.
Results. Comparison of VDQ and SESS inter-view classification of participan
ts' vulnerability at first contact indicated that the questionnaire had goo
d sensitivity and specificity. Test-retest scores for the VDQ indicated sat
isfactory levels of reliability. VDQ scores also predicted onset of clinica
l depression in the follow-up period.
Conclusions. Results suggest that the VDQ is an economical and effective me
ans of screening large populations for the purposes of risk assessment, to
aid future research into clinical depression and to facilitate the implemen
tation of intervention strategies.