Adverse hemodynamic effects of interrupting chest compressions for rescue breathing during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for ventricular fibrillationcardiac arrest

Background-Despite improving arterial oxygen saturation and pH, bystander c ardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with chest compressions plus rescue brea thing (CC+RB) has not improved survival from ventricular fibrillation (VF) compared with chest compressions alone (CC) in numerous animal models and 2 clinical investigations. Methods and Results-After 3 minutes of untreated VF, 14 swine (32 +/-1 kg) were randomly assigned to receive CC+RB or CC for 12 minutes, followed by a dvanced cardiac life support. All 14 animals survived 24 hours, 13 with goo d neurological outcome. For the CC+RB group, the aortic relaxation pressure s routinely decreased during the 2 rescue breaths. Therefore, the mean coro nary perfusion pressure of the first 2 compressions in each compression cyc le was lower than those of the final 2 compressions (14 +/-1 versus 21 +/-2 mm, Hg, P <0.001). During each minute of CPR, the number of chest compress ions was also lower in the CC+RB group (62 +/-1 versus 92 +/-1 compressions , P <0.001). Consequently, the integrated coronary perfusion pressure was l ower with CC+RB during each minute of CPR (P <0.05 for the first 8 minutes) . Moreover, at 2 to 5 minutes of CPR, the median left ventricular blood flo w by fluorescent microsphere technique was 60 mL . 100 g(-1) . min(-1) with CC+RB versus 96 mL . 100 g(-1) . min(-1) with CC, P <0.05. Because the art erial oxygen saturation was higher with CC+RB, the left ventricular myocard ial oxygen delivery did not differ. Conclusions-Interrupting chest compressions for rescue breathing can advers ely affect hemodynamics during CPR for VF.