Impact of pre-plant root substrate amendments on soilless substrate EC, pH, and nutrient availability

Citation
Js. Huang et Pv. Nelson, Impact of pre-plant root substrate amendments on soilless substrate EC, pH, and nutrient availability, COMM SOIL S, 32(17-18), 2001, pp. 2863-2875
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS
ISSN journal
00103624 → ACNP
Volume
32
Issue
17-18
Year of publication
2001
Pages
2863 - 2875
Database
ISI
SICI code
0010-3624(2001)32:17-18<2863:IOPRSA>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Pre-plant root substrate amendments have a great impact on the soluble salt level of plug seedling substrates. Nine common preplant amendments alone a nd a typical commercial combination of some of these showed that the greate st contributors to seedling substrate (2 sphagnum peat moss: 1 perlite: 1 v ermiculite by volume) electrical conductivity (EC) level were gypsum, calci um nitrate, and potassium nitrate. Moderate contributions were realized fro m triple superphosphate. Epsom salt. and two commercial micronutrient mixes . The salt contributions from dolomitic limestone and wetting agent were sm all and of little commercial concern. At the most common application rates for seedling substrate, additions of gypsum, calcium nitrate, potassium nit rate, and the mixture raised the total substrate EC (saturated media extrac t procedure) by 1.47, 1.23, 1.09, and 1.57 dS m(-1), respectively, from an initial no amendment level of 0.84 dS m(-1). The resulting EC levels were u nacceptable according to the current maximum standards. Seedling efficacy t ests should be conducted with special attention paid to gypsum, calcium nit rate, and potassium nitrate for possible reduction or elimination from the pre-plant nutrient charge. During the 12 days following sowing, mean substr ate EC for all amendments in the 0% leach treatment declined 19% while EC i n the 20% leach treatment declined 36%. Of all the pre-plant amendments tes ted, the only single amendment that increased substrate pH over the control treatment was dolomitic limestone. All other amendments lowered substrate pH by 0.1 to 0.24 units when applied at standard commercial rates. When dol omitic limestone was incorporated in combination with other amendments in t he mixture treatment. the substrate pH rise was not as great. The impacts o f rate of nutrient amendments on nutrient availability are presented.