There has been a rapid expansion in the commercial cultivation of genetical
ly modified crops, rising from the first plantings in 1995 to 44.5 million
hectares worldwide in 2000, most of which have grown in North America. Thou
gh there are sharp divisions in opinions on benefits and risk, genetic modi
fication (GM) does not represent a single, homogenous technology. Each appl
ication brings different potential benefits and risks for different stakeho
lders. This paper reviews recent scientific progress and future application
s using a new typology of three generations of genetically modified organis
ms (GMOs) ranged against five types of scientific application. Agricultural
GMOs pose a range of potential environmental and health risks. An analysis
of recent independent field and scientific evidence from industrialized co
untries summarizes the current state of knowledge on seven types of risk th
at apply to all agricultural systems: (1) horizontal gene flow; (2) new for
ms of resistance and pest problems; (3) recombination to produce new pathog
ens; (4) direct and indirect effects of novel toxins; (5) loss of biodivers
ity from changes to farm practices; (6) allergenic and immune system reacti
ons; and (7) antibiotic resistance marker genes. There remain highly contra
sting positions taken by different stakeholders over GMOs. A review of thre
e debates explains claims and counter-claims for (1) genetic modification a
s technological fix or contributor to sustainability; (2) genetic modificat
ion as driver of corporate power or friend of farmer; and (3) genetic modif
ication as feeder of the world or eliminator of alternatives.