I present a model demonstrating that, in social Hymenoptera, split sex allo
cation can influence the evolution of reproductive partitioning (skew). In
a facultatively polygynous population (with one to several queens per colon
y), workers vary in their relative relatedness to females (relatedness asym
metry). Split sex-ratio theory predicts that workers in monogynous (single-
queen) colonies should concentrate on female production, as their relatedne
ss asymmetry is relatively high, whereas workers in the polygynous colonies
should concentrate on male production, as their relatedness asymmetry is r
elatively low. By contrast, queens in all colonies value males more highly
per capita than they value females, because the worker-controlled populatio
n sex ratio is too female-biased from the queens' standpoint. Consider a po
lygynous colony in a facultatively polygynous population of perennial, soci
al Hymenoptera with split sex ratios. A mutant queen achieving reproductive
monopoly would gain from increasing her share of offspring but, because th
e workers would assess her colony as monogynous, would lose from the worker
s rearing a greater proportion of less-valuable females from the colony's b
rood. This sets an upper limit on skew. Therefore, in social Hymenoptera, s
kew evolution is potentially affected by queen-worker conflict over sex all
ocation.