R. Quinlan et Jp. Smol, Chironomid-based inference models for estimating end-of-summer hypolimnetic oxygen from south-central Ontario shield lakes, FRESHW BIOL, 46(11), 2001, pp. 1529-1551
1. Subfossil chironomid head capsules were sampled from surficial sediments
from 86 boreal shield lakes in south-central Ontario, Canada. Lake charact
eristics ranged from shallow to very deep (> 80 m), ultraoligotrophic to me
sotrophic, and with end-of-summer hypolimnetic oxygen conditions ranging fr
om near-saturation to anoxic.
2. Subfossil chironomid assemblages, comprising 44 taxa from 59 lakes, were
analysed using multivariate ordination techniques such as redundancy analy
sis (RDA) and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA). Forward selection in
RDA and CCA both showed that measures of oxygen, such as end-of-summer vol
ume-weighted hypolimnetic oxygen concentration (VWHO) and bottom oxygen con
centration (botO(2)), were the strongest explanatory variables for the chir
onomid data. Maximum depth and major ion chemistry were also important expl
anatory variables.
3. Oxygen inference models were developed using partial-least-squares regre
ssion (PLS), weighted-averaging partial-least-squares regression (WA-PLS),
and weighted averaging regression (WA). Models were developed using both th
e full 44 taxa assemblage (which included littoral taxa) and using only 15
profundal-type taxa.
4. Cross-validated models (jackknifing) using full-assemblage or profundal-
only taxa had similar statistical power (similar root mean squared error of
prediction, RMSEP). The best models had moderate predictive power, with an
r(jack)(2) as high as 0.56, and an RMSEP as low as 2.15 mg L-1 for [VWHO],
and an r(jack)(2) of 0.49 and an RMSEP of 0.24 for log([botO(2)] + 1).
5. Reconstruction of [VWHO] and [botO(2)] using a previously published chir
onomid profile that showed strong lake response to land-clearance and loggi
ng suggests that oxygen inference models are reliable and accurate, reflect
ing the qualitative changes occurring in subfossil assemblages. However, th
e profundal-only models may be misleading in situations where the ratio of
littoral-to-profundal subfossils changes drastically in response to lake di
sturbance.