In this article I consider the uses of the concepts 'society' and 'culture'
in various sociological and anthropological traditions, arguing that socio
logy needs to learn from the division between social anthropology and cultu
ral anthropology. First I distinguish the social and the cultural sciences:
the former use 'society' as leading concept and 'culture' as a subordinate
concept; the latter do the contrary. I discuss the origins of the terms so
ciete and Kultur in the classical French and German traditions respectively
, and their subsequent uptake in Anglo-American sociology and anthropology,
'society' becoming the leading concept for sociology and social anthropolo
gy, 'culture' the leading concept for cultural anthropology. I contrast the
sociology of culture with the cultural anthropological consideration of so
ciety. I next examine the terms for 'society' in the classical German tradi
tion, especially Weber, pointing to interpretivism as a cultural theory of
society. I then consider Weber's Kultursoziologie, arguing that it is cultu
re (Kultur) not society (Gesellschaft) that is the ultimate object of Weber
's sociology. I conclude that sociology needs to identify classical German
sociology and its derivatives as cultural science not social science, and t
o make comprehensive adjustments to its methodological debates accordingly.
The implications of this for the problem of sociology's encounter with the
natural world are noted.