CHANGES IN HOSPITALIZATION ASSOCIATED WITH INTRODUCING THE RESIDENT ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT

Citation
V. Mor et al., CHANGES IN HOSPITALIZATION ASSOCIATED WITH INTRODUCING THE RESIDENT ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 45(8), 1997, pp. 1002-1010
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Geiatric & Gerontology","Geiatric & Gerontology
ISSN journal
00028614
Volume
45
Issue
8
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1002 - 1010
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-8614(1997)45:8<1002:CIHAWI>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: 70 compare the rates of hospitalization among cohorts of nu rsing home residents assembled before and after the implementation of the federally mandated Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI). SAMPLE: S ubjects were nursing home residents chosen from 268 facilities in majo r Metropolitan Statistics Areas in 10 states and representing more tha n 1500 facilities and 60,000 residents. Two resident cohorts (1990 and 1993) were sampled (8 to 16 residents per facility, depending upon fa cility size) as part of an evaluation of the impact of implementing th e RAI. METHODS: Research nurses reviewed records, interviewed staff, o bserved patients, and completed an RAI at baseline and 6 months later. All transitions during this interval (hospital admissions, nursing ho me transfers, returns home, death, etc.) were tracked. Using polytomou s logistic regression, we tested the effect of cohort on the probabili ty of being hospitalized in light oi: the competing risks of dying or remaining in the home, controlling for demographic and case-mix variab les, and having a DNR order in the chart. RESULTS: A total of 4196 res idents were studied, 2118 in 1990 (age 81.3, female 77.7%, LOS 6+ mont hs 49.8%) and 2078 in 1993 (age 81.7, females 75.5%, LOS 6+ months 50. 2%). The unadjusted probability of hospitalization dropped from .205 t o .151. Multivariate analyses revealed a significant adjusted odds of hospitalization of .74 (95% CI .60-.91) and no cohort effect on home d ischarge or death. Among severely cognitively impaired residents, the adjusted odds of hospitalization in 1993 compared with the 1990 cohort was 0.74 (.53-1.03). Finally, among survivors in both cohorts who had a follow-up MDS performed, and whose ADL remained stable, 15.9% were hospitalized in 1990 whereas only 10.9% were hospitalized in 1993. On the other hand, ADL decliners were more likely to have been hospitaliz ed in 1993 than in 1990 (40.6% vs 25.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Although other changes in the industry, clinical practice, and health care policy may have influenced hospitalization of nursing home residents, the substa ntial reductions observed among the cognitively impaired and those wit h stable ADL, suggest superior and uniform assessment information in t he form oi the RAI contributed significantly to this decline.