Hardware and software techniques for controlling DRAM power modes

Citation
V. Delaluz et al., Hardware and software techniques for controlling DRAM power modes, IEEE COMPUT, 50(11), 2001, pp. 1154-1173
Citations number
47
Categorie Soggetti
Computer Science & Engineering
Journal title
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS
ISSN journal
00189340 → ACNP
Volume
50
Issue
11
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1154 - 1173
Database
ISI
SICI code
0018-9340(200111)50:11<1154:HASTFC>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
The anticipated explosive growth of pervasive and mobile computing devices that are typically constrained by energy has brought hardware and software techniques for energy conservation into the spotlight. While there have bee n several studies and proposals for energy conservation for CPUs and periph erals, energy optimization techniques for selective operating mode control of DRAMs have not been fully explored. It has been shown that, for some sys tems, as much as 90 percent of overall system energy (excluding I/O) is con sumed by the DRAM modules, thus, they serve as a good candidate for energy optimizations. Further, DRAM technology has also matured to provide several low energy operating modes (power modes), making it an opportunistic momen t to conduct studies exploring the potential benefits of mode control techn iques. This paper conducts an in-depth investigation of software and hardwa re techniques to take advantage of the DRAM mode control capabilities at a module granularity for energy savings. Using a memory system architecture c apturing five different energy modes and corresponding resynchronization ti mes, this paper presents several novel compilation techniques to both clust er the data across memory banks as well as to detect module idleness and pe rform energy mode transitions. In addition, hardware-assisted approaches (c alled self-monitoring) based on predictions of module interaccess times are proposed. These techniques are extensively evaluated using a set of a doze n benchmarks, It is shown that we get an average of 61 percent savings in D RAM energy using compiler-directed mode control. One of the self-monitored approaches gives as much as 89 percent savings (72 percent on the average), coming as close as 8.8 percent to the optimal energy savings that one can expect with DRAM module mode control. The optimization techniques are demon strated to be invaluable for energy savings as memory technologies continue to evolve.