Health plans and selection: Formal risk adjustment vs. market design and contracts

Citation
Rg. Frank et Mb. Rosenthal, Health plans and selection: Formal risk adjustment vs. market design and contracts, INQUIRY-J H, 38(3), 2001, pp. 290-298
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","Health Care Sciences & Services
Journal title
INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING
ISSN journal
00469580 → ACNP
Volume
38
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
290 - 298
Database
ISI
SICI code
0046-9580(200123)38:3<290:HPASFR>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
In this paper, we explore the demand for risk adjustment by health plans th at contract with private employers by considering the conditions under whic h plans might value risk adjustment. Three factors reduce the value of risk adjustment from the plans' point of view. First, only a relatively small s egment of privately insured Americans face a choice of competing health pla ns. Second, health plans share much of their insurance risk with payers, pr oviders, and reinsurers. Third, de facto experience rating that occurs duri ng the premium negotiation process and management of coverage appear to sub stitute for risk adjustment. While the current environment has not generate d much demand for risk adjustment, we reflect oil its future potential.