Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of
government regulation of private pharmacy practice in a low-income country.
Methods: The intervention comprised inspections of the pharmacies, informat
ion, and distribution of documents to drug sellers and sanctions. It was im
plemented at two different intensity levels, active and regular interventio
n. The methods used to assess the effect of the interventions were intervie
ws with the district drug inspectors, drug sellers and customers, inspectio
n of drug purchases, and indicator surveys of pharmacies. Indicators for ph
armacy-specific quality as well as for dispensing quality were developed.
Results: The main finding was one of strong overall improvements from initi
ally low levels. The improvements were particularly marked by increases in
the availability of essential materials for dispensing by 34% and in order
in the pharmacy by 19%. Information given to customers increased from 35% t
o 51% and the mixing of different drugs in the same package went down from
17% to 9%. The pharmacies in the active intervention districts showed great
er improvements for four of the six indicators, although statistically sign
ificant compared with the regular intervention districts only for the essen
tial materials indicator.
Conclusions: It was concluded that the regulatory activities have probably
been an important factor behind the service quality improvements. It appear
ed feasible as well as effective to regulate private pharmacy practice in t
his particular low-income setting.