Comparison of methods to express growth, size, and productivity of apple trees

Citation
Ja. Barden et Rp. Marini, Comparison of methods to express growth, size, and productivity of apple trees, J AMER POMO, 55(4), 2001, pp. 251-256
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
JOURNAL AMERICAN POMOLOGICAL SOCIETY
ISSN journal
15273741 → ACNP
Volume
55
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
251 - 256
Database
ISI
SICI code
1527-3741(200110)55:4<251:COMTEG>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Data from an 18-year rootstock trial with 'RedChief' and 'Red Prince' strai ns of 'Delicious' and 'Goldspur' and 'Smoothee' strains of 'Golden Deliciou s' were used to compare multiple ways to express tree productivity and effi ciency. Our data confirm the close relationship between trunk cross-section al area (TCA) and scion weight across a wide range of tree sizes. In additi on, our data show that cumulative yield increased at a decreasing rate as t ree size increased, whether expressed on the basis of scion weight or TCA. The regression between pruning time and TCA was linear for both strains of both cultivars. The cumulative crop-weight-to-final-scion- weight ratio (C/ S ratio) varied widely with rootstock, but much less with cultivar and stra in. Trees on M.9 rootstocks had a C/S ratio of about 15, indicating that th e average annual production of fruit for each of the 14 fruiting years was equal to the final scion weight. With M.7 and MM.111, the annual yields of fruit were equal to about 50% of the final scion weights. The relative diff erences in QS ratio were considerably greater than the cumulative yield eff iciencies reported earlier.