Underuse of primary Mycobacterium avium complex and Pneumocystis carinii prophylaxis in the United States

Citation
Sm. Asch et al., Underuse of primary Mycobacterium avium complex and Pneumocystis carinii prophylaxis in the United States, J ACQ IMM D, 28(4), 2001, pp. 340-344
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease",Immunology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES
ISSN journal
15254135 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
340 - 344
Database
ISI
SICI code
1525-4135(200112)28:4<340:UOPMAC>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the rates of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and Pneumocystis carinii (PCP) prophylaxis adherence to guidelines an d how they have changed after introduction of effective antiretroviral ther apy. Objective: To determine rates of primary prophylaxis for MAC and PCP and to evaluate the influence of sociodemographic characteristics. region, and pr ovider experience. Design: National probability sample cohort of HIV patients in care. Setting: One hundred sixty HIV health care providers. Patients: A total of 2864 patients interviewed in 1996 to 1997 (68% respons e) and 2267 follow-up interviews, representing 65% of surviving sampled pat ients (median follow-up, 15.1 months). Measurements: Use of prophylactic drugs, most recent CD4 count, sociodemogr aphics, and regional and total HIV patients/providers. Results: Of patients eligible for primary MAC prophylaxis (most recent CD4 count < 50/mm(3)), 41% at baseline and 40% at follow-up patients were treat ed. Of patients eligible for primary PCP prophylaxis (i.e., those with CD4 counts < 200/mm(3);). 64% and 72% were treated, respectively. MAC prophylax is at baseline was less likely in African American (adjusted odds ratio [OR ], 35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.59), Hispanic (OR, 27; 95% CI, 0.08-0.94) and less-educated (OR, 0.61; 95% Cl, 0.36-1.0) patients and more likely in U. S. geographic regions in the Pacific West (OR, 4.9; 95% Cl, 1 .0-23) and Midwest (OR, 6.4; 95% Cl, 1.2-33) and in practices with more HIV patients. Conclusions: Most eligible patients did not receive MAC prophylaxis; PCP pr ophylaxis rates were better but still suboptimal. Our results support outre ach efforts to African Americans, Hispanics, the less educated, and those i n the northeastern United States and in practices with fewer HIV patients.