A detailed analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of coupled-cluster and
many-body perturbation theories in treating strongly interacting potential
energy surfaces is presented. Standard coupled cluster theory is shown to p
rovide a qualitative treatment of Herzberg-Teller coupling that is vastly s
uperior to that associated with perturbation theory. However, it also predi
cts unphysical effects that will always cause it to fail in describing the
topology of potential energy surfaces in the immediate vicinity of conical
intersections. To treat problems involving strong interstate coupling (nota
bly those involving radicals subject to pseudo-Jahn-Teller effects), method
s based on equation-of-motion (linear response) coupled-cluster theory appe
ar to be considerably more suitable. In particular, they provide a descript
ion of intersecting surfaces that is qualitatively correct in all respects.
It is also shown that there is no reason to believe that the noniterative
inclusion of triple excitation contributions to the correlation energy shou
ld provide for any systematic improvement in describing this class of pheno
mena. (C) 2001 American Institute of Physics.