Me. Thase et al., Efficacy of mirtazapine for prevention of depressive relapse: A placebo-controlled double-blind trial of recently remitted high-risk patients, J CLIN PSY, 62(10), 2001, pp. 782-788
Background: The necessity of antidepressant continuation-phase therapy foll
owing acute-phase response has resulted in the need to characterize the lon
ger-term efficacy and safety of all new medications. Previous studies using
"extension" protocols suggest that mirtazapine has sustained antidepressan
t effects. The current study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and saf
ety of up to I year of mirtazapine therapy, using a more rigorous, randomiz
ed, placebo-controlled discontinuation design.
Method: An intent-to-treat sample of 410 patients meeting DSM-IV criteria f
or moderate-to-severe recurrent or chronic major depressive episodes began
8 to 12 weeks of open-label therapy with mirtazapine (flexibly titrated, 15
-45 mg/day). Thereafter, 156 fully remitted patients (according to Hamilton
Rating Scale for Depression and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement sc
ores) were randomly assigned to receive 40 weeks of double-blind continuati
on-phase therapy with either mirtazapine or placebo.
Results: Mirtazapine therapy reduced the rate of depressive relapse by more
than half, with 43.8% of patients relapsing on treatment with placebo as c
ompared with 19.7% of the mirtazapine-treated patients. The discontinuation
rate due to adverse events was 11.8% for active mirtazapine therapy versus
2.5% for placebo. Although weight gain was significantly greater in the gr
oup receiving active medication during the double-blind phase (p = .001), p
atients taking mirtazapine gained only 1.4 kg (3.1 lb) across the 40 weeks
of continuation therapy, and there was no difference in the rates of weight
gain as a new-onset adverse event.
Conclusion: Continuation-phase therapy with mirtazapine is effective and we
ll tolerated.