In this article, the author discusses some of the methodological implicatio
ns of conducting long-distance ethnographic research. The author suggests t
hat while distance is not without its advantages (such as helping the resea
rcher maintain novelty and/or feign ignorance when appropriate), it also po
ses serious challenges (e.g., cutting the researcher off from his or her su
pport network and/or imposing an "unnaturally" restrictive timetable,). In
this light, distance might best be seen as a potential tool in the research
er's toolkit. The article concludes by situating long-distance ethnography
in the tradition of voluntary risk taking or "edgework."