Validation of POAM III aerosols: Comparison to SAGE II and HALOE

We describe statistical comparisons between Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measure ment (POAM) III and Stratosphere Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) II measu rements of aerosol extinction in 1998 and 1999. SAGE II and POAM III are in qualitative agreement, and show that since the launch of POAM III in March of 1998, stratospheric aerosol extinctions at visible and near-IR waveleng ths have remained at background levels. We present quantitative differences between the SAGE II and POAM III extinctions at 1.02 mum. and 0.45 mum for temporally and spatially coincident measurements. At 1.02 mum the instrume nts agree to within about 30% from 10 to 22 km, where most of the aerosol e xtinction ties. Differences at 0.45 mum are similar to 1.02 mum in the sout hern hemisphere, but much larger in the northern hemisphere. We show that d ifferences between SAGE II and POAM III slant path optical depths closely r esemble the aerosol extinction differences at 1.02 mum, but not at 0.45 mum . On the basis of these results we conclude that the aerosol extinction dif ferences at 1.02 mum arise from differences in the slant path optical depth measurements of the two instruments, not from species separation differenc es in the retrieval algorithms. However, we tentatively attribute the aeros ol extinction differences at 0.45 mum to an error in the NO2/aerosol specie s separation in the SAGE II retrievals. We present theoretical simulations incorporating the maximum plausible systematic pointing or timing errors in the POAM III instrument. We conclude that these errors cannot explain the 1.02 mum optical depth or aerosol extinction differences, although it is po ssible that they contribute to the observed differences. We thus attribute these differences to fundamental radiometric differences between POAM III a nd SAGE II that remain to be resolved. We also compare derived surface area s and volume densities from FOAM III, SAGE II, and the Halogen Occultation Experiment (HALOE). The statistical differences can be explained by the aer osol extinction differences in the SAGE II comparisons, and by the lack of sensitivity on the part of POAM III and SAGE II to very small aerosols in t he HALOE comparisons. Nevertheless, we show qualitative agreement between a ll three instruments. The results presented here show that the POAM III aer osol measurements are valid for scientific studies.